Tuesday, May 12, 2009
Wednesday, May 6, 2009
Something Between My Boobs
vs. KA KW (Kenwood Head vs. Kitchenaid)
These robots are dreaming over a budding cook. What is the best of both? It is a major issue, especially as it represents an investment of € 1000 to 1500 with accessories.
My answer: the winner is ... Kenwood Head A little steep given the quality of its competitor? Yes, the battle was hard. It is divided into several acts, twists and jolts.
The first chapter of this battle is the engine block. The winner is Kitchenaid, hands down. Its engine is not only more beautiful, less noisy but also more robust. The mechanics of the engine and transmission Kenwood are much more complicated and less reliable shot. In KA, the hinges are of much better quality, the block is beautiful naked, beautiful finishes, especially the small screw removal of the front block. It is a true object of decoration, which can have multiple colors. Bravo.
However, on the appendages, the robot KA is less efficient, with only two outs against four Kenwood. Of course, we can multiply a speed as on a bike, but this is not enough and does not compensate for the practical benefit of having of motor outputs on the top of the robot.
The battle is still tight on chapter accessories Kenwood chef but still takes the advantage. KA, pell-mell: accessories very robust, a splendid ice cream maker but no blender in its range of tools when he comes in the basic kit with the Chef. The Kitchenaid juicer is one of the great weakness of the robot. I do not know how engineers are Kitchen Aid, apple juice, their centrifuge perplexing. The juicer KA is vertical, which is not very practical either.
On Kenwood accessories are renewed each year, which has its advantages and disadvantages. It's nice to know that the company is constantly innovating by creating new products and improving every year, small errors. Now it's annoying to know that his slicing flawed and that the new version is better ... A 100 € accessory, these design errors can irritate. It is expected to buy quality, not disposable. The immobility of Kitchenaid advantage in this area do not regret the purchase of a range of accessories.
short on accessories, the KA is still very less than the KC.
Both engines are excellent anyway, and the price of accessories is the largest in the total cost (in 1500 €, it requires between 500 € for engine accessories and 1000 €), both choose the robot more efficient in this area.
For me, the robot would be a perfect engine KitchenAid, with an additional output on top, and accessories Kenwood chef, but would not change every year.
http://www1.kenwoodworld.com/fr/local.php
http://www.kitchenaid.fr/app.cnt/ka/fr_FR/pageid/pgkahome001
For parts: 
These robots are dreaming over a budding cook. What is the best of both? It is a major issue, especially as it represents an investment of € 1000 to 1500 with accessories.
My answer: the winner is ... Kenwood Head A little steep given the quality of its competitor? Yes, the battle was hard. It is divided into several acts, twists and jolts.
The first chapter of this battle is the engine block. The winner is Kitchenaid, hands down. Its engine is not only more beautiful, less noisy but also more robust. The mechanics of the engine and transmission Kenwood are much more complicated and less reliable shot. In KA, the hinges are of much better quality, the block is beautiful naked, beautiful finishes, especially the small screw removal of the front block. It is a true object of decoration, which can have multiple colors. Bravo.
However, on the appendages, the robot KA is less efficient, with only two outs against four Kenwood. Of course, we can multiply a speed as on a bike, but this is not enough and does not compensate for the practical benefit of having of motor outputs on the top of the robot.
The battle is still tight on chapter accessories Kenwood chef but still takes the advantage. KA, pell-mell: accessories very robust, a splendid ice cream maker but no blender in its range of tools when he comes in the basic kit with the Chef. The Kitchenaid juicer is one of the great weakness of the robot. I do not know how engineers are Kitchen Aid, apple juice, their centrifuge perplexing. The juicer KA is vertical, which is not very practical either.
On Kenwood accessories are renewed each year, which has its advantages and disadvantages. It's nice to know that the company is constantly innovating by creating new products and improving every year, small errors. Now it's annoying to know that his slicing flawed and that the new version is better ... A 100 € accessory, these design errors can irritate. It is expected to buy quality, not disposable. The immobility of Kitchenaid advantage in this area do not regret the purchase of a range of accessories.
short on accessories, the KA is still very less than the KC.
Both engines are excellent anyway, and the price of accessories is the largest in the total cost (in 1500 €, it requires between 500 € for engine accessories and 1000 €), both choose the robot more efficient in this area.
For me, the robot would be a perfect engine KitchenAid, with an additional output on top, and accessories Kenwood chef, but would not change every year.
http://www1.kenwoodworld.com/fr/local.php
http://www.kitchenaid.fr/app.cnt/ka/fr_FR/pageid/pgkahome001
For parts:
DEPEM - 104, rue de Maubeuge, Paris 10e - 01.42.85.31.84
http://www.swissmenage.ch/fr/index.html
http:/ / www.torreelectrics.co.uk / acatalog / Chef___Major_food_mixers.html
http:/ / www.torreelectrics.co.uk / acatalog / Chef___Major_food_mixers.html
Tuesday, May 5, 2009
Monday, May 4, 2009
Dentitex Toothbrush Replacement Heads
It operates without electricity, with an engine with CO2.
no interest, but "design"
Sunday, May 3, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)